KP STOLLER, MD
EBO-LA vs. EBO-LIE there is nothing to fear, but fear itself.....
As always... follow the money and the usual suspects will reveal themselves.
First and foremost, it is almost impossible for Ebola to become a runaway pandemic.
Close contact with victims is required – close enough to be exposed to body fluids, and while those fluids can be coughed or sneezed into your face, the point is you need to be that close – so this is not easily spread under its own power.The health and nutritional conditions in developed nations would seem to make a runaway outbreak unlikely, but be-that-as-it-may...it always helps to be prepared,
BECAUSE EVEN IN THE USA THERE ARE SERIOUS MINERAL AND VITAMIN DEFICIENCIES PRESENT.
The threat of Ebola spreading has been exaggerated due to the spectacular nature of the symptoms, and because of the spectacular nature of those symptoms it is should be fairly containable.
So, remain CALM.
It goes without saying that if there is a way to profit from a pandemic or the fear of a pandemic the usual suspects have already lined up. It seems as if there has already been one False-Flag pandemic and perhaps attempts at others, and where there is one there will be another because no one is being held responsible.
The current Ebola outbreak (as there have been several) is reminiscent to an incident in 2009 when Baxter shipped 72 kilos of seasonal flu vaccine contaminated by the bird flu virus (H5N1). If this had not been caught it most probably would have caused a real global pandemic and all martial law measures that go with a global pandemic. Baxter said it was an accident, but Level 3 facilities don't have accidents, and no one was held accountable. So, are we to believe that the DoD, a collaborator in the first human Ebola clinical trial, gave a contract worth $140 million dollars to Tekmira, a pharmaceutical company, to conduct Ebola research, on a vaccine for Ebola in West Africa in March (2014), and this had nothing to do with an outbreak in the very area a few weeks after the trial began?
Furthermore, there is the USA funded Viral Hemorrhagic Fever Consortium right in Kenema, the third largest city in Sierra Leone. In May, 2014, the Guardian published an article giving the warning of researchers at Harvard and Yale universities in the USA who argue that the benefits of the work are outweighed by the risk of pathogenic strains escaping from laboratories and spreading around the world.
Therefore, it is a legitimate question to ask whether the current outbreak is a natural one, or
one started to test the effectiveness of a vaccine or a lab accident or just about selling
vaccine to a fearful world.
Disinformation would be key to a pandemic false flag operation.
Have the CDC and WHO become disinformation agents for a
planned Ebola/Martial Law pandemic false flag?
If a level 6 pandemic emergency is called FEMA and DHS take control of the country
and the Constitution is suspended.
In the summer of 2009, when the Swine Flu scare was at its height, the CDC just stopped doing tests
and stopped counting numbers of American Swine Flu cases, yet claimed the disease was spreading
fast and tens of thousands of Americans would be dead.
Sharyl Attkisson, then a reporter for CBS at the time, broke the story and the CDC responded by saying
the number of Swine Flu cases in America were really “tens of millions of cases.” (see below)
Could the CDC, at least the infectious disease division of the CDC, be into Psy-Ops.?
The truth is there have been some major blunders, most have been hidden!
"In 1918, the US Army forced the vaccination of 3,285,376 natives in the Philippines when no epidemic was brewing, only the sporadic cases of the usual mild nature. Of the vaccinated persons, 47,369 came down with small-pox, and of these 16,477 died. In 1919 the experiment was doubled. 7,670,252 natives were vaccinated. Of these 65,180 victims came down with small-pox, and 44,408 died. In the first experiment, one-third died, and in the second, two-thirds of the infected ones died." ----- from Dr. William Koch's book, The Survival Factor in Neoplastic and Viral Diseases.
Fast forward to 1976..... "the swine-flu vaccination program was one of its (CDC) greatest blunders. It all began in 1976 when CDC scientists saw that a virus involved in a flu attack outbreak at Fort Dix, N.J., was similar to the
swine-flu virus that killed 500,000 Americans in 1918. Health officials immediately launched a 100-million
dollar program to immunize every American. But the expected epidemic never materialized, and the
vaccine led to partial paralysis in 532 people. There were 32 deaths." U.S. News and World Report,
Joseph Carey, October 14, 1985, p. 70, "How Medical Sleuths Track Killer Diseases."
The Spanish influenza epidemic in 1918-1919 reportedly killed at least 40 million people worldwide -
it may have been twice that, but was the virus an unknown contaminant in the vaccines that were
pushed on everyone may never be proven, but is certainly plausible. The number of deaths caused by the recommendation at the time to take 1000mg of aspirin every hour on the hour has to be factored in as well.
Let's take the time machine back to 1988, where a report was published in the LANCET
questioning the use of the anti-fertility vaccine in Nigeria... did anyone care... NO.
Click on the article at right to read a larger version.
This is a real problem.. no one cares about what happens in Africa until it starts
happening outside of Africa, ... are we going to do anything about it?
The CDC (Department of HHS, etc) own patents on Ebola and all variances up to 70%
of the variance, so they will receive a royalty every time a treatment is provided because
of the alteration of their intellectual property rights.
It seems illogical that one would allow the same entity that might profit from a pandemic
to be calling the shots, so to say, on how to run the pandemic.
In early, 2009, with just 20 confirmed cases of Swine Flu, WHO declared a level-6
pandemic, its highest danger category - let the panic begin (all from a lab created flu
virus released into a poor Mexico City slum - no one held accountable). WHO had to
even change its definition of pandemic removing widespread death and severe
debilitation from what defines a pandemic (wonder who pressured them to do that?).
And what about thoses 36,000 cases of death caused by the flu every year, or at least
so says the CDC - that sounds more like an epidemic (if only the numbers were real, but
they are not). Sounds like we-the-people are getting manipulated. But decide for yourself:
"During the pandemic, CDC provided estimates of the numbers of 2009 H1N1 cases,
hospitalizations and deaths on seven different occasions. Final estimates were published
in 2011. These final estimates were that from April 12, 2009 to April 10, 2010 approximately
60.8 million cases (range: 43.3-89.3 million), 274,304 hospitalizations (195,086-402,719)
, and 12,469 deaths (8868-18,306) occurred in the United States due to pH1N1
." "CDC Estimates of 2009 H1N1 [Swine Flu] Influenza Cases, Hospitalizations and Deaths in the US."
Does the obvious need to be stated here? Up to 90 million cases of H1 N1? No evidence for that anywhere.Clearly a violation of the Data Quality Act if nothing else.
Factions of the government and specifically the CDC seem to be compromised, conflicted and have unclean hands. If they moved to block the spread of Ebola would they be working against their own financial interests as it would cut into their potential profits?
This would clearly seem, at the very least, to be a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act where agencies of the Federal Government need to follow their own rules and regulations. However, legal discussion is beyond the scope of this piece.
Now to be clear, what follows is not intended to step on anyone's intellectual property rights by providing information that theoretically might interfere with the activity of the patented Ebola virus (after all Monsanto sues farmers when GMO pollen blows into the fields of those farmers).
What we know currently is that convalescent serum together with human interferon was given to a British researcher who became infected while working with EBOLA virus in the laboratory and he survived (this was back in the 1970's), but as why he survived was not clear, but passive immune therapy (assuming supplies can be adequate and they are not) seems to hold some promise for some patients.
There are some potential antiviral drugs, such as fabipiravir from Japan, and brincidofovir, but there are off-patent anti-viral drugs that may be far more effective, but you won't hear about them as they are off-patent and not big money makers.
ZMapp are man-made antibodies but supplies are exhausted, and then there is TKM-Ebola that supposedly halts the virus from reproducing (human trials halted).If the EBOLA infection spreads widely all of us will be encouraged or even ordered to take a vaccine that has not been proven to be efficacious and has who-knows-what side-effects, and if you get sick you will be offered IV fluid and a body bag not necessarily in that order. A vaccine is being tested right now - it was waiting in the wings, almost ready to go... just needed the right opportunity.
The below is based on the best available knowledge - they are postulated interventions that are available to all and are not original - but no claims, guarantees or recommendations are being made here - only information…if you take this information and actually use it in the hopes you will accomplish anything you do so at your own peril, for you may be inviolation of the intellectual property rights of the owners of the Ebola patents.
Viral infections can trigger many forms of illness including cancer,
but if one's nutritional status is stellar
the chance of a viral trigger being able to initiate disease is small.
The Ebola virus appears to be Selenium dependent (Theoretical Evidence that the Ebola Virus Zaire Strain May Be Selenium-Dependent: A Factor in Pathogenesis and Viral Outbreaks?;Ethan Will Taylor and Chandra Sekar Ramanathan; The Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine Vol. 10, No.2, 1995;http://orthomolecular.org/library/jom/1995/articles/1995-v10n0304-p131.shtml),
which means it drains its host of Selenium (Se), and thus drained the host is vulnerable to high levels of oxidative stress, "...the possibility that a rapid depletion of Se due to the formation of viral selenoproteins could be a factor contributing to the severity of the hemorrhagic symptoms is mechanistically very feasible.
Our analysis suggests that severe Ebola infections could produce an artificial and extreme Se depletion, resulting in extensive cellular damage due to lipid peroxidation, combined with enhanced thrombosis. This could also contribute to the associated immune deficiency that has been observed in Ebola infections."
Selenium is a strong antioxidant and anti-inflammatory that can control the inflammatory cytokine storms triggered by infections. Several inflammatory cytokines are induced by oxidative stress and cytokines also lead to increased oxidization by triggering the release of more inflammatory cytokines. This is why giving the flu vaccine to pregnant women (mercury issues aside) is so completely inane because the flu vaccine can set off a cytokine storm and injure the fetus.
It is most likely that the residents of West Africa could be Selenium deficient as I suspect many are even in developed nations, where, for example, vitamin D deficiency is ubiquitous. There are many Selenium deficient areas on the planet, so being a resident of a developed nation is not a guarantee of optimal nutrition. If the answer to Ebola were as simple as adequate Selenium levels along with a few other nutrients, be assured that you won't be told that. Money will not be made telling the world to consume more Selenium or vitamin D for that matter.
In the last quarter of a century, the average daily selenium intake has fallen from 60µg/day to 35µg/day, and even 60 is an inadequate level. The organic form of selenium provided by selenium yeast differs in bioavailability and metabolism compared with inorganic (e.g., selenate, selenite) forms of dietary selenium. Dietary supplementation using selenium yeast is the only form one should consider using and there is no questions that it is associated with increased ability to counteract oxidative stress (Kiremidjian-Schumacher, L. & Roy, M.  Selenium and immune function. Z. Ernahrungswiss. 37: 50–56.) Selenium yeast has been used in a plethora of studies looking at the significance of selenium status in the incidence and progression of a variety of infectious and degenerative diseases (McKenzie, R. C., Rafferty, T. S., Arthur, J. R. & Beckett, G. J. (2001) Effects of selenium on immunity and aging. In: Selenium: Its Molecular Biology and Role in Human Health (Hatfield, D. L., ed.), pp. 258–272. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.).
Findings of increased viral virulence in selenium-deficient hosts and certain viral strains have been shown to mutate more rapidly in selenium-deficient individuals producing more virulent viruses. Selenium yeast supplementation (200 μg/d) was evaluated in a 9-month double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in HIV-positive adult men and women. Daily supplementation was found to suppress progression of HIV-1 viral burden and provide indirect improvement to CD4 cell counts.(Selenium status diminishes with HIV disease progression; low selenium status has been shown to be a predictor of HIV-related mortality (Hurwitz B, Klaus J, Llabre M, et al. Suppression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 viral load with selenium supplementation. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:146-154. Baum M, Shor-Posner G, Lai S, et al. High risk of HIV-related mortality is associated with selenium deficiency. JAIDS 1997;15:370-374. Baum M, Camps A. Role of selenium in HIV/AIDS. In: Hatfield D, Berry MJ, Gladyshev V, eds. Selenium: Its molecular biology and role in human health, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2006: 299-310.)
This is not meant to be a comprehensive treatise on Selenium, but to point out that almost everyone should be supplementing with 200 µg/day and if Ebola is in the area that dose should probably probably be twice that amount. And if one has the Ebola virus the dose should be more like 400 µg twice a day (this is an adult dose). But if one is suspecting exposure to the Ebola virus multiple other anti-oxidants should be used simultaneously with Selenium.
And while that last paragraph sounds like a recommendation for Ebola intervention it is only a postulation, untested speculation that should be considered of academic interest only and the subject of future research. You are not to do anything you think is being suggested here, least you improve your health and thereby interfere with the opportunity others have to profit from your dis-ease.
There are those that believe that not only will the Ebola virus rapidly deplete Selenium, but it takes down vitamin C stores as well as other anti-oxidants, and it needs to do this before it can effectively go after the body's immune system. So much has been written about Vitamin C for treating illness that I will keep this short. Vitamin C can be taken in massive amounts, but taking too much orally can cause loose stools (bowel intolerance). Combined with the fact that it has a very short half-life, it is best to take high dose Vitamin C in as many doses as possible, so let's say the optimal dose for someone just coming down with the first symptoms of Ebola is 12 grams a day - that would be 1 gram per hour. And would probably be better for your intestines to take it in a liposome version. (NOTE: while this might be the right dose, this website is not suggesting you do or take this information and apply it in the hopes of treating anything ).Liposomal Vitamin C, where the ascorbic acid is wrapped in a fat such as phosphotidylcholine, would probably eliminate bowel intolerance but the massive and super massive doses of Vitamin say will not only backfire if taken orally, they just aren't required even tho there are those that will advocate for it.
The mechanism by which high levels of Vitamin C could help kill virus has to do with NADPH.
NADPH provides the reducing equivalents for biosynthetic reactions and theoxidation-reduction involved in protecting against the toxicity of ROS (reactive oxygen species), allowing the regeneration of reduced glutathione.
But somewhat paradoxically NADPH is responsible for generating free radicals in immune cells. In other words, NADPH provides the ability to white blood cells to cause significant oxidative stress to the pathogens they engulf.
Large enough doses of Vitamin C will recycle NADP+ (spent NADPH) back to NADPH, and NAD+ back to NADH, restoring the body's ability to infections and protect against free radical damage cause by the disease.
Not only does Glutathione help recirculate Vitamin C, but also just like Vitamin C a treatise could be written about it. It is the grease to our ball bearings - it may not fix broken ball bearings but if they are broken you want as much grease as possible.
Taking it orally means ingesting it as a liposome (because otherwise it will be destroyed in the stomach) or by taking it in its acetyl form (Acetyl Glutathione or S acetyl Glutathione). When there is too little glutathione present in the body, the production of inflammatory cytokines can go unchecked.
If one were becoming symptomatic with Ebola a dose around 3000 mg per day might be appropriate, so that would been about ten 300 mg capsules of Acetyl Glutathione distributed throughout the day, or the liposomal equivalent.
(NOTE: again no recommendations of dose or claims are being made here only speculative musings and theoretical translational applications).
Vitamin D, while not an antioxidant per se, is critical in making sure the immune system can do its job and fight virus infections and it is almost a guarantee that if you are not supplementing with extra vitamin D3 you are most certainly deficient. The normal range for vitamin D is between 30 and 100, but you want to be around 60 or more. That would require most adults to be on at least 5000 iu's of D3 per day. The darker one's skin is (the more melanin present) the more sun exposure is required for the body to make its own vitamin D.
So, in the situation in Africa, you have a population that is not only selenium deficient but quite likely vitamin D deficient as well.
Viral infections can be the trigger many forms of illness including cancer, but if one's nutritional status is stellar the chance of a viral trigger being able to initiate disease is small.
(YOU JUST WON'T BE TOLD THIS BECAUSE IT DOESN'T MAKE ANYONE BIG PROFITS).
The dose of D3 for someone who actually has the virus would be 50,000 iu per day for at least a week (in combination with Vitamin K2 - it is really important to include K2 when taking super massive doses of D3 to eliminate any untoward effects of having such a high level of this vitamin in the body.
Now, what does one do if symptoms are starting?
The active ingredient in the spice tumeric will down-regulate the severity of the cytokine storm that will be unleashed once the infection gets to the point where symptoms are present.
You take as much as is required to mitigate the severity of those symptoms, but Curcumin is not well absorbed orally, so a liposomal form would be best, but supplies of that and availability will be compromised, so another oral form will have to be considered and the dose depends on how well it is mitigating symptoms. Several grams, several times a day may be required.
Omega 3 EFAs
The high omega 3 fish oils will also work with Curcumin to down-regulate the cytokine storm. Required doses may be as high as 10 grams a day - maybe more.
You defeat the enemy by knowing how it/they work(s). Ebola seems to work by first crashing important antioxidants and if you can stop the crash it makes sense that you will stop the illness. The public will be told none of this because there is no money to be made telling people to take nutraceuticals, and helping people feel less frightened about the possibility of exposure to Ebola defeats the purpose of the Psy-Op.
This information is being provided without any recommendations or suggestions that doing any of the above will do anything for anyone who has Ebola.
This is all just neutral information. No claims, recomendations, or implications that taking any of the above supplements will assist you or help you in anyway preventing or treating Ebola.
Nor is this website or its webmaster claiming that the USA or agents acting on its behalf are engaged in any activity that is not proper, legal, ethical, truthful and beyond reproach.