EBO-LA   vs.   EBO-LIE  there is nothing to fear, but fear itself.....

As always... follow the money and the usual suspects will reveal themselves.

 

First and foremost, it is almost impossible for Ebola to become a runaway pandemic.

Close contact with victims is required – close enough to be exposed to body fluids, and while those fluids can be coughed or sneezed into your face, the point is you need to be that close – so this is not easily spread under its own power.The health and nutritional conditions in developed nations would seem to make a runaway outbreak unlikely, but be-that-as-it-may...it always helps to be prepared,

 

BECAUSE EVEN IN THE USA THERE ARE SERIOUS MINERAL AND VITAMIN DEFICIENCIES PRESENT.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The threat of Ebola spreading has been exaggerated due to the spectacular nature of the symptoms, and because of the spectacular nature of those symptoms it is should be fairly containable.

 

So, remain CALM.

 

It goes without saying that if there is a way to profit from a pandemic or the fear of a pandemic the usual suspects have already lined up. It seems as if there has already been one False-Flag pandemic and perhaps attempts at others, and where there is one there will be another because no one is being held responsible.

 

The current  Ebola outbreak (as there have been several) is reminiscent to an incident in 2009 when Baxter shipped 72 kilos of seasonal flu vaccine contaminated by the bird flu virus (H5N1). If this had not been caught it most probably would have caused a real global pandemic and all martial law measures that go with a global pandemic. Baxter said it was an accident, but Level 3 facilities don't have accidents, and no one was held accountable. So, are we to believe that the DoD, a collaborator in the first human Ebola clinical trial,  gave a contract worth $140 million dollars to Tekmira, a pharmaceutical company, to conduct Ebola research, on a vaccine for Ebola in West Africa in March (2014), and this had nothing to do with an outbreak in the very area a few weeks after the trial began?

 

Furthermore, there is the USA funded Viral Hemorrhagic Fever Consortium right in Kenema,  the third largest city in Sierra Leone. In May, 2014, the Guardian published an article giving the warning of researchers at Harvard and Yale universities in the USA who argue that the benefits of the work are outweighed by the risk of pathogenic strains escaping from laboratories and spreading around the world.

                                                 

   Therefore, it is a legitimate question to ask whether the current outbreak is a natural one, or

one started to test the effectiveness of a vaccine  or a lab accident or just about selling

vaccine to a fearful world.  

 

Disinformation would be key to a pandemic false flag operation.

 

Have the CDC and WHO become disinformation agents for a

planned Ebola/Martial Law pandemic false flag?   

 

If a level 6 pandemic emergency is called  FEMA and DHS  take control of the country

and the Constitution is suspended. 

 

In the summer of 2009, when the Swine Flu scare was at its height, the CDC just stopped doing tests

and stopped counting numbers of American Swine Flu cases, yet claimed the disease was spreading

fast and tens of thousands of Americans would be dead.

 

Sharyl Attkisson, then a reporter for CBS at the time, broke the story and the CDC responded by saying

the number of Swine Flu cases in America were really “tens of millions of cases.” (see below)

 

Could the CDC, at least the infectious disease division of the CDC, be into Psy-Ops.? 

 

The truth is there have been some major blunders, most have been hidden!

"In 1918, the US Army forced the vaccination of 3,285,376 natives in the Philippines when no epidemic was brewing, only the sporadic cases of the usual mild nature. Of the vaccinated persons, 47,369 came down with small-pox, and of these 16,477 died. In 1919 the experiment was doubled. 7,670,252 natives were vaccinated. Of these 65,180 victims came down with small-pox, and 44,408 died. In the first experiment, one-third died, and in the second, two-thirds of the infected ones died." ----- from Dr. William Koch's book, The Survival Factor in Neoplastic and Viral Diseases.

 

Fast forward to 1976..... "the swine-flu vaccination program was one of its (CDC) greatest blunders. It all began in 1976 when CDC scientists saw that a virus involved in a flu attack outbreak at Fort Dix, N.J., was similar to the

swine-flu virus that killed 500,000 Americans in 1918. Health officials immediately launched a 100-million

dollar program to immunize every American. But the expected epidemic never materialized, and the

vaccine led to partial paralysis in 532 people. There were 32 deaths." U.S. News and World Report,

Joseph Carey, October 14, 1985, p. 70, "How Medical Sleuths Track Killer Diseases."

 

The Spanish influenza epidemic in 1918-1919 reportedly killed at least 40 million people worldwide -

it may have been twice that, but was the virus an unknown contaminant in the vaccines that were

pushed on everyone may never be proven, but is certainly plausible. The number of deaths caused by the recommendation at the time to take 1000mg of aspirin every hour on the hour has to be factored in as well.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let's take the time machine back to 1988, where a report was published in the LANCET

questioning the use of the anti-fertility vaccine in Nigeria... did anyone care... NO.

 

Click on the article at right to read a larger version.

 

 

 

This is a real problem.. no one cares about what happens in Africa until it starts

happening outside of Africa, ... are we going to do anything about it?

 

 

The CDC (Department of HHS, etc) own patents on Ebola and all variances up to 70%

of the variance, so they will receive a royalty every time a treatment is provided because

of the alteration of their intellectual property rights.

 

It seems illogical that one would allow the same entity that might profit from a pandemic

to be calling the shots, so to say, on how to run the pandemic.

 

In early, 2009, with just 20 confirmed cases of Swine Flu, WHO declared a level-6

pandemic, its highest danger category - let the panic begin (all from a lab created flu

virus released into a poor Mexico City slum - no one held accountable). WHO had to

even change its definition of pandemic removing widespread death and severe

debilitation from what defines a pandemic (wonder who pressured them to do that?).

And what about thoses 36,000 cases of death caused by the flu every year, or at least

so says the CDC - that sounds more like an epidemic (if only the numbers were real, but

they are not). Sounds like we-the-people are getting manipulated. But decide for yourself:

 

"During the pandemic, CDC provided estimates of the numbers of 2009 H1N1 cases,

hospitalizations and deaths on seven different occasions. Final estimates were published

in 2011. These final estimates were that from April 12, 2009 to April 10, 2010 approximately

60.8 million cases (range: 43.3-89.3 million), 274,304 hospitalizations (195,086-402,719)

, and 12,469 deaths (8868-18,306) occurred in the United States due to pH1N1

 

 

 

." "CDC Estimates of 2009 H1N1 [Swine Flu] Influenza Cases, Hospitalizations and Deaths in the US."

 

Does the obvious need to be stated here? Up to 90 million cases of H1 N1? No evidence for that anywhere.Clearly a violation of the Data Quality Act if nothing else.

 

Factions of the government and specifically the CDC seem to be compromised, conflicted and have unclean hands. If they moved to block the spread of Ebola would they be working against their own financial interests as it would cut into their potential profits?

 

This would clearly seem, at the very least, to be a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act where agencies of the Federal Government need to follow their own rules and regulations. However, legal discussion is beyond the scope of this piece.

 

Now to be clear, what follows is not intended to step on anyone's intellectual property rights by providing information that theoretically might interfere with the activity of the patented Ebola virus (after all Monsanto sues farmers when GMO pollen blows into the fields of those farmers).

 

What we know currently is that convalescent serum together with human interferon was given to a British researcher who became infected while working with EBOLA virus in the laboratory and he survived (this was back in the 1970's), but as why he survived was not clear, but passive immune therapy (assuming supplies can be adequate and they are not) seems to hold some promise for some patients.

 

There are some potential antiviral drugs, such as fabipiravir from Japan, and brincidofovir, but there are off-patent anti-viral drugs that may be far more effective, but you won't hear about them as they are off-patent and not big money makers.

 

ZMapp are man-made antibodies but supplies are exhausted, and then there is TKM-Ebola that supposedly halts the virus from reproducing (human trials halted).If the EBOLA infection spreads widely all of us will be encouraged or even ordered to take a vaccine that has not been proven to be efficacious and has who-knows-what side-effects, and if you get sick you will be offered IV fluid and a body bag not necessarily in that order. A vaccine is being tested right now - it was waiting in the wings, almost ready to go... just needed the right opportunity.

 

The below is based on the best available knowledge - they are postulated interventions that are available to all and are not original - but no claims, guarantees or recommendations are being made here - only information…if you take this information and actually use it in the hopes you will accomplish anything you do so at your own peril, for you  may be inviolation of the intellectual property rights of the owners of the Ebola patents.